Meteor

Meteor is an AI job-application agent built for immigrants and international students: it matches roles on the server side, rewrites your resume and cover letter for each posting, then fills in and submits the forms on employer career portals for you, with no browser extension needed at any point.

Core capabilities

• Server-side auto-applying: connects directly to ATS platforms such as Greenhouse, Lever, Ashby, and Workday and submits in batches using your saved profile
• Per-role tailoring: every application gets resume bullets and a cover letter rewritten against the JD, and the PDF that was actually sent is kept as a receipt
• ATS checker: upload a resume plus a JD to see keyword gaps and line-by-line rewrite suggestions; scoring needs no login
• Application tracking: optionally connect read-only Gmail access to gather confirmations, verification codes, and interview invitations into one inbox
• MCP access: a remote MCP server that plugs into your AI assistant (ChatGPT, Claude, or Claude Code) so you can drive applications by conversation

Use cases A good fit for candidates on F-1/OPT/STEM OPT who are studying or just graduating, targeting highly similar roles (junior SWE, DA, PM), and working against a tight timeline. Credits scale by tier: Free gives 25 one-time applications, Starter gives 400 per month, Pro gives 3,000 per month, and MCP batches are best kept at 10 or fewer. It suits senior or niche roles less well, and the same goes for people job-hunting while employed who need discretion.

What sets it apart Most tools in this category are browser extensions that fill in forms for you; Meteor moves submission to the server, can hand back a submission receipt, and has built in an immigration context and an MCP channel. Be clear about the edges: the company names only four ATS platforms and publishes no full list; it does not guarantee sponsorship, an offer, or a hire, nor 150 applications a day; LinkedIn and similar platforms explicitly prohibit automated applications, and the company says it only submits public application forms and that its ToS puts compliance on the user, so account-restriction risk is yours to weigh; Gmail content is not used for training, but no exclusion is promised for training on resume and application content.

Editor's take A good fit for people who want to run applications like a pipeline and are willing to set up a review checklist: validate accuracy on the free allowance first, lean on Starter through peak season, and only move to Pro once you genuinely use the volume. What it saves is screening and form-filling time, not the odds of landing an interview.